Sunday, April 28, 2019

The Consumer Centric Behavior of Indian Stock Markets

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the sum of Consumption (C), Government Spending (G), Savings (S) and the difference of Exports and Imports (X – M). Mathematically, GDP = C + G + S + X – M. Different countries exhibit different characteristics in GDP and GDP growth. For example, in the United States, the GDP is primarily fueled by consumption. Consumption accounts for about 70% of the total GDP in the United States. On the other hand, in China, savings and exports contribute a significant portion of the country’s GDP. In India, GDP is primarily driven by consumption as seen in Chart A below.

Charts A: GDP and Household Consumption in India (1960 – 2017) Source: World Bank

In 2017, India’s GDP was US $2.66 trillion of which US $1.488 trillion came from household consumption - a contribution of 56%. One could argue from the chart above that over the years, the contribution of consumption to GDP has gone down significantly and the argument is true. In 1990, household consumption accounted for 67% of India’s GDP whereas in 2017, the contribution was 56%, a drop of 11% in 27 years. However, one has to understand that from 1990 to 2017, India’s GDP has increased from US $507 billion to US $2.66 trillion which is more than a 5-fold increase. Consequently, household consumption has also grown significantly from US $38 billion to US $1.488 trillion – a 4.4 times increase which is not insignificant by any means. (Note: All GDP and related figures are in constant 2010 US $ terms to eliminate any effects of foreign exchange translation).
In addition, we have to also look at how the population and per capita consumption has increased from 1990 to 2017. In 2018, India’s population was 1.339 billion as compared to 870 million in 1990 (see Chart B below). This accounts for an increase in 54% over 27 years or a population growth of about 1.6% per annum.

Chart B: Population in India (1960-2017) Source: World Bank

During the same period from 1990 to 2017, per capita household consumption in India has increased from US $388 to US $1,111 (see Chart C below). Also, it is interesting that the rate at which per capita household consumption has increased has also accelerated. Between 2000 and 2010, per capital household consumption increased by 47% whereas, the same increase between 1990 and 2000 was 31%. In seven years between 2010 and 2017, per capita household consumption has increased by 49%. At this pace, in 2020 per capita household consumption in India might be 70% more than what it used to be in 2010.

Chart C: Per Capita Household Consumption in India (1960 – 2017) Source: World Bank
 
Based on the analysis thus far, one can safely arrive at two important conclusions:
  • In India, household consumption is a major driver of GDP.
  • In the coming years, per capita household consumption is expected to increase and could thus provide significant boost to the GDP.
The question then is how has the stock market in India reacted to increasing household consumption. After all, the financial markets are efficient and prices reflect all available information. Therefore, our hypothesis is that the companies in India that cater to household consumer demand should have done well.

In order to validate this hypothesis, we need to classify publicly traded companies. For this purpose, we used the FactSet Revere Business Classification System (RBICS). RBICS is a multi-level industry classification system and we have used the topmost level called ‘RBICS Economy’ for this exercise. Each of the RBICS Economies has been classified into one of the three Economic Sectors – Consumer, Infrastructure and Technology (see Table I below).

Table I: RBICS Economy and classification into Consumer, Infrastructure or Technology


Based on this classification, we then created two stock market indices of publicly traded companies in India - India Consumer Index and India Infrastructure Index. For each of these indexes, we consider companies whose RBICS Economy Code fall in the corresponding economic sectors as outlined in Table I. After all, the best way to assess the performance of a stock market or a segment of the stock market is to create an index and track the performance of the index over time. In financial engineering, this process is called ‘Back-testing’.

The specifications for these indices are as follows:
  • Number of constituents: 50
  • Currency: Indian Rupee
  • Review and Rebalancing Frequency: Quarterly on Mar 31st, June 30th, Sep 30th and Dec 31st
  • Weighting Methodology: Free-float Market Value Weighted
  • Eligibility Criteria:
    • Average monthly turnover (turnover is monetary value of stocks traded) over last 12 months is at least US $2 million
    • Average market capitalization over the last 3 months is at least US $250 million
  • Ranking:
    • The eligible companies are then ranked by free-float market capitalization and the top 50 are selected in each review period
Free-float Market Capitalization = Free-float Factor * Market Capitalization. Free-float Factor represents the proportion of shares that are tradeable and are not held by entities like government, promoters, holding company, joint venture, sovereign wealth fund, etc. The rationale is that these owners buy and hold the shares for long periods and these shares are not available for trading in the stock markets.

The performance of the India Consumer Index is very impressive. The index was back-tested from Jan 1st, 2008 to Dec 31st, 2018 – a span of 11 years. The year 2008 was deliberately selected as the starting point to capture the global economic downturn precipitated by the banking crisis worldwide. Over these 11 years, the cumulative returns of the India Consumer Index is 270% as compared to 77% for Nifty-50 and 78% for BSE Sensex (see Chart D and Tables II & III below).


Chart D: Comparative Performance of India Consumer Index and Nifty-50
 
Table II: Comparative Performance of India Consumer Index and Nifty-50
Table III: Top 20 constituents of India Consumer Index
By comparison, the India Infrastructure Index underperforms significantly. Over the same period Jan 1st, 2008 to Dec 31st, 2018, the cumulative returns are 26% and in addition, the volatility is higher than Nifty-50 and BSE Sensex by about 3% (See Chart E and Tables IV & V below).

Chart E: Comparative Performance of India Infrastructure Index and Nifty-50
Table IV: Comparative Performance of India Infrastructure Index and Nifty-50
Table V: Top 20 constituents of India Infrastructure Index

Conclusions:
  • In todays’ world, financial markets worldwide are very efficient and they incorporate all available information into the prices of securities and the Indian stock market is not an exception. As is evident from the analysis, the Indian equity markets have obviously reacted to the fact that household consumption is a major driver of the Indian economy and will continue to be so in the future.
  • Given the fact that household consumption is becoming such a major driver of the economy, it is worth giving a substantive tax cut to the middle class. That has the potential of driving up household consumption even higher and could spur the economy instantaneously. The skeptics will argue that such a move will result in inflation. The counter argument for that is in recent years in India, inflation has been historically low and this could be the best time to spur economic growth further by boosting household consumption through a substantive tax break.
  • Also, the Indian equity markets are not optimistic about the infrastructure sector. The prices in equity markets project future trends and based on such belief, one has to conclude that in the near future, things do not look very bright for companies in the infrastructure sector in India. There could however be potential value in this sector in the long run say, 20-30 years.

Disclaimer: This analysis is neither an endorsement nor a criticism of the economic and monetary policies of the Government of India or the policies followed by the governments in power since 1990. This study is a purely an attempt to understand some of the drivers of the equity markets in India.

 

 

5 comments:

  1. Shouldn't retail banks be part of Consumer instead of Infra?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we can include retail banks as part of Consumer. However, large banks like ICICI and HDFC has both retail and corporate banking and it is difficult to include part of ICICI or HDFC in consumer and the remaining in Infra. Secondly, even if we include retail banks in Consumer, the conclusions don't change.

      Delete
  2. GDP is a good indicator of economic growth. But what about economic well being of citizens. Citizenry will feel better if it's able to spend more. Therefore it's always a good strategy to keep taxes low. The analysis records the obvious. Thanks for putting out a credible mathematical model. But infrastructure also needs to be catered to. Govt or big business will need capital to fund infrastructure projects. Funds have lesser affinity to long gestation period projects. Governments and big business can afford to have long ter view of economy. Therefore the infrastructure should either remain or be made a lucrative option in the long run, or govt should adopt coersive taxes to fund the infrastructure projects. All we hear on this matter is that govt wants foreign capital to fill this gap. Which may not be a long term solution in absolute terms. No aversion to foreign capital is expressed here. Only syating that - it can't be postulated that infrastructure projects should be exclusively funded from foreign capital while taxes are reduced to fuel consumption. Actually there is a gap in understanding here. Instead of a vanilla statement that taxes should be reduced, there should be a quantitative analysis as to how much reduction in taxes is optimal. We should of course be able to see clearer after the analysis presented. This should not be the end of study.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Though household consumption is a large driver of India's GDP, i dont think that giving a tax cut to the middle class is the way to increase the welfare of the economy. The first point being that it will definitely cause inflation, keeping the purchasing power of the people same or might even cause a decrease. You did not deny that it will cause inflation, you just said that inflation has been at a historically low poiny which is not entirely true. Inflation was 5.24 percent in 2018. It was lower in the years 1999-2004. Secondly, giving tax cuts will increase the GDP as prices will rise, so consumption will rise. But this GDP increase will not mean an increase in the well being of an economy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Consumption is one of the most important factor in the Indian economy at this stage contributing towards the national GDP. The middle class as you have mentioned, I totally support your point here where the tax cut can make a huge difference in the consumption of the economy as the large part of the population falls under the MIDDLE CLASS CATEGORY and providing them with a tax cut would lead to increase in the real purchasing power.
    (Also in the above mentioned comment)
    The optimum level of inflation is set to be 5.5 obviously depending differently upon the country it can be some points below or above. I totally agree that increase in GDP might not always depict that there's a growth but if we are comparing here, 5.24% is an average and a well maintained inflation rate. It was Lower in the 1999-2014, but one should also keep the time frame in mind. In the long term everything is said to fall back to constant. According to me cut in taxes is a very smart way to increase the consumption and therefore the aggregate demand.

    ReplyDelete